SaaS purchasing platform Vertice reports that enterprises are overpaying between an average of 20%-30% for collaboration tools. Credit: iStock As popularity of project collaboration software grows along with other software-as-a-service products, a research report from SaaS purchasing platform Vertice shows that more than 90% of enterprises are overpaying for these tools. The project collaboration software market is estimated to reach a value of $27.40 billion by the end of 2022, from $21.69 billion in 2021, according to a report from Grand View Research, which links the growth to factors such as the evolution of the workplace and the rising need to incorporate effective means of team collaboration across different geographies in an enterprise due to the pandemic. Another survey, conducted by market research firm Gartner, showed that there was a 44% increase in the use of SaaS-based project collaboration tools between 2019 and 2021. This increase in usage of these collaboration tools have led more than 80% of vendors to increase their price listing by 10% every year since 2019, the Vertice report showed. Lack of pricing transparency is a challenge A lack of transparency in pricing seem to be the biggest challenge for enterprises when buying project collaboration software, resulting in overpayment for these tools, according to the Vertice report. A meagre 14% of software vendors selling project collaboration software list prices on their website or through third parties, the report showed. The nondisclosure of pricing poses a significant challenge for enterprises as they are not able to compare pricing across a variety of vendors, the company said in its report, adding that most project collaboration vendors require a consultation with their sales teams before they quote a price. Lack of pricing transparency also plagues the broader SaaS category as well. Only 45% of vendors list pricing online, while 55% of vendors obscure pricing from potential customers, a separate report from OpenView Venture Partners showed. Is long-term commitment the answer? Considering long-term commitment or multiyear contracts could be the only solution that an enterprise might have when looking to seek discounts while buying project collaboration tools, Vertice said. Currently, 89% of project collaboration vendors offer discounts based on term length, the report showed. In addition, the autorenewal clauses of software contracts also contributes to price increases, Vertice said, noting that 91% of vendors have autorenewal clauses stipulated in their contracts and nearly 72% of project collaboration vendors have clauses that allow them to change their pricing at any given time. “It’s typical for vendors to automate the cost increases that are passed onto customers,” the company said in a statement. Related content news NASA appoints first chief AI officer as the technology’s importance rises The US space agency has quietly pioneered AI for decades. With CDO David Salvagnini’s expanded remit, it now has a dedicated leader to coordinate and secure use of the rapidly advancing technology. By John Dunn May 14, 2024 4 mins Aerospace and Defense Industry Chief Data Officer Government IT news analysis China-US AI talks Tuesday have absurdly low expectations Best case scenario from the talks is that China will agree to maybe talk some more, but given how high the stakes are, that may be enough. By Evan Schuman May 14, 2024 7 mins Regulation Generative AI IT Governance news Adobe introduces AI assistant to help enterprises exploit data held in PDFs Rather than read through long documents, workers will be able to ask questions of them using Adobe’s new Acrobat AI Assistant for enterprise. By Sascha Brodsky May 14, 2024 1 min Generative AI Enterprise Applications news 2024 CIO50 Saudi Arabia Awards: Nominations are now open By Andrea Benito May 14, 2024 4 mins PODCASTS VIDEOS RESOURCES EVENTS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe