Honeycomb

FEBRUARY 15, 2022

I had shared my initial experiences and impressions in this post and thought it would make sense to check back in now that I’ve had the opportunity to spend time learning about the team, the culture, and the code base more in depth. . Think of: Well, this one is pretty natural to the software world. Provide tools and assistance.

Software Review 133

Software Review Systems Review Engineering Culture 133

Honeycomb

APRIL 26, 2022

Any significant shift in an organization’s software engineering culture has the potential to feel tectonic, and observability (o11y for short)—or more specifically, Observability Driven Development —is no different. This is why we highly encourage all teams to instrument their code to emit telemetry data. .

Weak Development Team 52

Weak Development Team Software Review Systems Review Real Estate 52

Honeycomb

JULY 12, 2023

But to give credit where it’s due: it’s natural for startup founders to look for ways to get more out of their team, and yet it doesn’t seem to be as natural to recognize successes by granting new titles and roles. There are always new problems to level up on, if you’re willing to lend a hand with whatever comes up. A generalist streak.

Part-Time VPE 98

Part-Time VPE Engineering B2C Technical Review 98

Honeycomb

AUGUST 2, 2022

For me, it’s the emphasis on the social aspects of engineering, despite this being a very engineering and product-driven company. At Honeycomb? The same process takes maybe an hour. I’m still in shock! R : An hour at worst! Q: What are some bad habits you had to unlearn from other companies?

Engineering 52

Engineering Technical Review Software Review Culture 52

Honeycomb

MARCH 16, 2023

As a secondary objective, SREs at Honeycomb may write incident reviews, blog posts, and participate in webinars and conference talks. Think of: Urban planners ’ roles around public consultation, transportation management, sanitation infrastructure, and sustainable growth.

Systems Review 74

Systems Review Sustainability Engineering Scalability 74

Altexsoft

MARCH 3, 2023

For example, in a cross-functional team that is working on a new product development, one member may be actually responsible for market research while the others work on coding, testing and product’s implementation, etc. Here, we will focus on software development so the roles will be chosen correspondingly. Software engineer.

Examples 52

Examples UI/UX Development Technical Review 52

LaunchDarkly

JANUARY 14, 2020

At the November Test in Production Meetup in San Francisco, LaunchDarkly’s Yoz Grahame (a Developer Advocate) moderated a panel discussion featuring Larry Lancaster, Founder and CTO at Zebrium, and Ramin Khatibi, a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) and infrastructure consultant. I did a bunch of stuff at different code paths.

Weak Development Team 10

Weak Development Team DevOps Testing Agile 10

Honeycomb

APRIL 15, 2024

tool, Pax8 faced hurdles in fostering a culture of ownership and curiosity due to user-based pricing limitations and an impending steep price increase. Pax8’s platform engineering team was keen on modernizing the company’s cloud commerce platform, but they were hitting obstacles with their traditional observability 1.0

Engineering Culture 110

Engineering Culture Culture Engineering Software Review 110

Honeycomb

JULY 14, 2023

I was always able to find something to squeeze in between meetings or at the end of the day: convert a file to typescript, look at a dashboard, read a document, refactor a test, do a code review, check in with a teammate, answer a question in slack, etc.

Part-Time VPE 98

Part-Time VPE Engineering Weak Development Team Energy 98

LeanEssays

JULY 14, 2019

Lean was introduced to software a couple of decades ago. The Nature of Software “Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail” -- Ralph Waldo Emerson It’s May 27, 1997. I show that these models derive from opposing assumptions about the nature of the software-debugging task.

Software Review 91

Software Review Software Engineering Continuous Delivery Technical Review 91